CHAPTER 28
INCIDENT RUNNING
The being often flinches from painful incidents. Because he cannot face the contents of an incident, he will develop unpleasant and even irrational associations between factors within it. Because he is unwilling to confront things connected with the incident, there will be things which he is no longer willing to be, do, or have. And because he is unwilling to have it happen again, he will set up automatic and reactive mental machinery to protect himself and, as is often the case, he will eventually loose control over this machinery and it will operate on a subconscious basis.
This is a major source of mental charge, inability, and reduced awareness.
Unconfonted painful incidents tend to lock up on top of each other. When a person can’t face something, he tends to fall into the same circumstances again and again because he can’t take effective action or handle the situation. His own mental flinch at the earlier incident causes him to think and act poorly when it seems like it might happen again.
The circumstances of life can stir up one of these old incidents and trigger it so to speak, by hitting enough of the unconfronted contents. We call this “restimulating” the incident.
When an incident gets restimulated, the person tends to drag the whole thing into the present and may again feel some of the unpleasant effects of the original incident.
Running out these old buried painful incidents was the target of Dianetics. L. Ron Hubbard wrote a great deal on this subject. Many of the phenomena and mechanisms described in his book “Dianetics the Modern Science of Mental Health” (DMSMH) can be observed in practice. However, much of the clockwork behavior of the “reactive mind” and the absolutes hypothesized by the book are inaccurate and fall away in the light of more advanced theories which consider the person to be an immortal spirit.
It is the being himself who creates his own mental state, mocks up his own mental machinery, and drags these old painful pictures around. Most of this is operating subconsciously, but he can bring it back under his own control. Many of the drills in this book aim at moving various things back into conscious control.
The being’s strongest reason for carrying around pictures of old incidents and giving them the power to restimulate and react (often to his detriment) is his non-confront of the pain that occurred in these incidents.
He did not face them when they happened, so he has a lack of data and awareness in the area. But he doesn’t want them to happen again. So he is afraid to forget them while at the same time he doesn’t want to remember them consciously. So he keeps a picture of the incident around and lets it react without looking at it or controlling it.
The solution is very simple. You raise your confront of old painful incidents until this kind of thing doesn’t bother you anymore and you can toss the whole mechanism. This has sometimes been called a state of “clear” because one no longer has these old painful incidents reacting out of one’s control.
Unfortunately, there has been a lot of sales hype on this state of “clear”. It is not actually being cleared of all aberration. There are many other factors and we have been addressing quite a few of them in this book. But this particular point of no longer having one’s mind twisted by the weight of past pain is a significant one and it is worth rolling up your sleeves and putting in some work to achieve it.
The way to do it is to begin with easy incidents and work up to more difficult ones on a gradual basis.
Early Dianetics did the exact opposite, trying to find the underlying incidents which might be the cause of something in a misguided effort to attempt to work some miracle cure. This lead to various tricks which would throw the person into incidents that were over their head. Even professionals had a great deal of difficulty with those kind of techniques and they are totally impossible for use on a solo basis. And those miracles were always elusive, only occurring on a sporadic basis, because painful incidents are far from the only source of aberration.
So don’t push hard and get fanatical about finding “the incident” that explains everything or some such foolishness. Instead, just work to raise your confront of painful incidents bit by bit until the whole idea becomes one big joke.

