CHAPTER 44
ETHICS, MORALITY, AND THE DYNAMICS
Morality consists of trying to do what is good or right by obeying the rules of society or a particular group or a particular code of behavior and conduct.
Ethics, on the other hand, consists of attempting to do what is truly good or right in the absolute sense.
These two often come into conflict.
In the beginning, the being’s ethical sense is very high. He desires to associate with other beings and he desires to operate in an optimum manner.
But the being is inexperienced and the games and struggles are fun and gradually he looses sight of what is optimum.
And eventually he decays to the point where he feels the need for some external moral code to help him behave in an optimum manner.
This fails, but he blames the failure on other’s immorality, and so he begins to impose his moral codes on others.
This in turn leads to further conflict.
Soon he is fighting to force others to be good and violating his own ethics every step of the way.
And if he goes too far with this, he looses his feeling of community with other beings and thereafter seeks to enslave them.
But people do not stay frozen at the bottom of this pattern. Luckily, it is always possible for us to start over.
And so we shift between three different states of operation.
a) Operating from a sense of ethics. In this case one is unrestrained in a relative sense.
b) Operating from a ridged moral code. In this case one imposes heavy restraints on oneself and others. Here one often suffers from regrets and suffers as well from the side effects of having many withholds.
c) Operating in negation of morality. In this case the surface appearance is of operating without restraints, but the unconscious restraints are greater because deep down one is in conflict with oneself. Here one has few regrets, and the withholds are present but unreal, however one suffers extensively from pulling in motivators for the overts that one has committed.
Obviously, one is better off operating in an ethical manner. But that leaves one with the problem of judging what is optimum. And this raises the question of optimum by what standard?
Let’s begin by looking over some potential standards in this area.
